Following are the Major changes made in the new Bharatia Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, as regards ‘Documents’(when compared to Indian Evidence Act, 1872).
Changes in the Definition
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
Sec. 3. Interpretation-clause. “Document”. –– “Document” means any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks, or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter. Illustrations A writing is a document; Words printed lithographed or photographed are documents; A map or plan is a document; An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document; A caricature is a document. | Sec. 2(1) In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires,— (d) “document” means any matter expressed or described or otherwise recorded upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or any other means or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter and includes electronic and digital records. Illustrations. (i) A writing is a document. (ii) Words printed, lithographed or photographed are documents. (iii) A map or plan is a document. (iv) An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document. (v) A caricature is a document. (vi) An electronic record on emails, server logs, documents on computers, laptop or smartphone, messages, websites, locational evidence and voice mail messages stored on digital devices are documents; |
Sec. 3. Interpretation-clause. “Evidence”. ––“Evidence” means and includes –– (1) all statements which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry; such statements are called oral evidence; (2) all documents including electronic records produced for the inspection of the Court; such documents are called documentary evidence. | Sec. 2(1) In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires,— (e) “evidence” means and includes— (i) all statements including statements given electronically which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry and such statements are called oral evidence; (ii) all documents including electronic or digital records produced for the inspection of the Court and such documents are called documentary evidence; |
Under the Indian Evidence Act, electronic evidence could have been taken as a third category of ‘evidence’, other than ‘oral’ and ‘documentary’ evidences. It is more so in view of the interpretation given to Sec. 65B by the Supreme Court in Arjun Panditrao v. Kailash Kushanrao, (2020)3 SCC 216. In this decision it was said that Electronic Evidence is (specially) dealt with “notwithstanding anything contained” in the Act.
By virtue of the definitions in the new act, it is made clear – Electronic Evidence is included in the ‘Documentary Evidence’. It is definite that it is with a view to expand the scope of the application of Electronic Records in evidence.
Changes on Primary Evidence – Electronic Records are also Included in the category , Primary Evidence
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
62. Primary evidence. –– Primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection of the Court. Explanation 1. ––Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence of the document. Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart being executed by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as against the parties executing it. Explanation 2. –– Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, as in the case of printing, lithography or photography, each is primary evidence of the contents of the rest; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not primary evidence of the contents of the original. | 57. Primary evidence Primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection of the Court. Explanation 1.—Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence of the document. Explanation 2.—Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart being executed by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as against the parties executing it. Explanation 3.—Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, as in the case of printing, lithography or photography, each is primary evidence of the contents of the rest; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not primary evidence of the contents of the original. Explanation 4.—Where an electronic or digital record is created or stored, and such storage occurs simultaneously or sequentially in multiple files, each such file is primary evidence. Explanation 5.—Where an electronic or digital record is produced from proper custody, such electronic and digital record is primary evidence unless it is disputed. Explanation 6.—Where a video recording is simultaneously stored in electronic form and transmitted or broadcast or transferred to another, each of the stored recordings is primary evidence. Explanation 7.—Where an electronic or digital record is stored in multiple storage spaces in a computer resource, each such automated storage, including temporary files, is primary evidence. |
The scope of application of Electronic Records in evidence is further expanded by the Additional Explanations 4 to 7 in Sec. 57 (as to ‘Primary Evidence’). Major changes having practical importance are the following:
Scope of Secondary Evidence also Expanded
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
63. Secondary evidence . –– Secondary evidence means and includes –– (1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained; (2) copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves insure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies; (3) copies made from or compared with the original; (4) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them; (5) oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it. | 58. Secondary evidence Secondary evidence includes— (i) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained; (ii) copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies; (iii) copies made from or compared with the original; (iv) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them; (v) oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it; (vi) oral admissions; (vii) written admissions; (viii) evidence of a person who has examined a document, the original of which consists of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court, and who is skilled in the examination of such documents. |
The new clauses in Sec. 58, that speaks about Secondary Evidence, also show the legislative intent of liberalization in evidence in legal proceedings. Certificates and Reports of ‘skilled persons’ (as regards the documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court) are added in the list of Secondary Evidence.
Part II
Changes made to Sec. 65A & 65B (Electronic Records) in Evidence Act
Sec. 61, a New Provision
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
(No specific provision in the Act) | 61. Electronic or digital record . Nothing in this Adhiniyam shall apply to deny the admissibility of an electronic or digital record in the evidence on the ground that it is an electronic or digital record and such record shall, subject to section 63, have the same legal effect, validity and enforceability as other document. |
Importance of this New Provision
The words in the new Sec. 61, “Nothing in this Adhiniyam shall apply to deny the admissibility” has great significance. It is made to expand the scope of admissibility of Electronic Evidence.
The non-obstante clause (‘notwithstanding anything contained in the Act’) in Sec. 65B (Sec. 63, BSA) is capable of giving two (divergent) interpretations –
The words in the new Sec. 61, “Nothing in this Adhiniyam shall apply to deny the admissibility” makes an emphatic delineation of the legislative intent on the following two matters –
Note: 1. If this interpretation is not given, Sec. 61 stands meaningless.
Note: 2. This interpretation is also necessary to give effect to the legislative intent (liberalization of evidence).
Note: 3. Invoking Sec. 61, a copy taken in a CD or pen-drive (which is obviously ‘made by mechanical processes which in itself insure the accuracy’) can be given in evidence, with the oral evidence to the effect that it is the copy taken from the Electronic Record (original). Now, because of Arjun Panditrao v. Kailash Kushanrao, 2023 SCC 216, we cannot give evidence in this manner; for, according to Arjun Panditrao ‘computer output (copy) can be proved only’ under the provisions of Sec. 65B, that is with the “Sec. 65B Certificate” (‘notwithstanding anything contained in the Act’).
Changes to Sec. 65A and 65B
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
65A. Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record. –– The contents of electronic records may be proved in accordance with the provisions of section 65B. | 62. Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record. The contents of electronic records may be proved in accordance with the provisions of section 63. |
No material change is made by this new provision which stands as an introductory provision to Sec. 63.
Abstract of changes to Sec. 65B:
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Bharatia Sakshya Act, 2023 |
65B. Admissibility of electronic records – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any information contained in an electronic record which is printed on a paper, stored, recorded or copied in optical or magnetic media produced by a computer (hereinafter referred to as the computer output) shall be deemed to be also a document, if the conditions mentioned in this section are satisfied in relation to the information and computer in question and shall be admissible in any proceedings, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence or any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of which direct evidence would be admissible. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-section (1) in respect of a computer output shall be the following, namely:– (a) the computer output containing the information was produced by the computer during the period over which the computer was used regularly to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period by the person having lawful control over the use of the computer; (b) during the said period, information of the kind contained in the electronic record or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived was regularly fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities; (c) throughout the material part of the said period, the computer was operating properly or, if not, then in respect of any period in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of the period, was not such as to affect the electronic record or the accuracy of its contents; and (d) the information contained in the electronic record reproduces or is derived from such information fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities. (3) Where over any period, the function of storing or processing information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) was regularly performed by computers, whether– (a) by a combination of computers operating over that period; or (b) by different computers operating in succession over that period; or (c) by different combinations of computers operating in succession over that period; or (d) in any other manner involving the successive operation over that period, in whatever order, of one or more computers and one or more combinations of computers, all the computers used for that purpose during that period shall be treated for the purposes of this section as constituting a single computer; and references in this section to a computer shall be construed accordingly. (4) In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things, that is to say, — (a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced; (b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer; (c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate, and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this subsection it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it. (5) For the purposes of this section, (a) information shall be taken to be supplied to a computer if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment; — (b) whether in the course of activities carried on by any official, information is supplied with a view to its being stored or processed for the purposes of those activities by a computer operated otherwise than in the course of those activities, that information, if duly supplied to that computer, shall be taken to be supplied to it in the course of those activities; (c) a computer output shall be taken to have been produced by a computer whether it was produced by it directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment. Explanation. — For the purposes of this section any reference to information being derived from other information shall be a reference to its being derived therefrom by calculation, comparison or any other process | 63. Admissibility of electronic records – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Adhiniyam, any information contained in an electronic record which is printed on paper, stored, recorded or copied in optical or magnetic media or semiconductor memory which is produced by a computer or any communication device or otherwise stored, recorded or copied in any electronic form (hereinafter referred to as the computer output) shall be deemed to be also a document, if the conditions mentioned in this section are satisfied in relation to the information and computer in question and shall be admissible in any proceedings, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence or any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of which direct evidence would be admissible. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-section (1) in respect of a computer output shall be the following, namely:— (a) the computer output containing the information was produced by the computer or communication device during the period over which the computer was used regularly to create, store or process information for the purposes of any activity regularly carried on over that period by the person having lawful control over the use of the computer or communication device; (b) during the said period, information of the kind contained in the electronic record or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived was regularly fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities; (c) throughout the material part of the said period, the computer or communication device was operating properly or, if not, then in respect of any period in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of the period, was not such as to affect the electronic record or the accuracy of its contents; and (d) the information contained in the electronic record reproduces or is derived from such information fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities. (3) Where over any period, the function of creating, storing or processing information for the purposes of any activity regularly carried on over that period as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) was regularly performed by means of one or more computers or communication device, whether— (a) in standalone mode; or (b) on a computer system; or (c) on a computer network; or (d) on a computer resource enabling information-creation or providing information—processing and storage; or (e) through an intermediary all the computers used for that purpose during that period shall be treated for the purposes of this section as constituting a single computer; and references in this section to a computer shall be construed accordingly. (4) In any proceeding where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things shall be submitted along with the electronic record at each instance where it is being submitted for admission, namely:— (a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced; (b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer or a communication device referred to in clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (3); (c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate, and purporting to be signed by a person in charge of the computer or communication device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this sub-section it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it in the certificate specified in the Schedule. (5) For the purposes of this section,— (a) information shall be taken to be supplied to a computer or communication device if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment; (b) a computer output shall be taken to have been produced by a computer or communication device whether it was produced by it directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment or by other electronic means as referred to in clauses (a) to (e) of sub-section (3). |
Changes made to Sec. 65B
The proposed Bhartiya Sakshya Act, 2023 introduces significant changes in Sec. 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It updates Sec. 65B, as under:
A Discordant Note
The Certificate required in Sec. 63(4)(c) of the new Act must be “in the form specified in the Schedule”. It appears that this certificate is needed in addition to the Certificate that is required in sub-section (4) as regards the matters enumerated therein; or the Certificate should contain (additionally) the matters enumerated in sub-section (4).
The Form in the Schedule directs to state as under:
The requirement for this certificate is unnecessary, especially in situations where there is no dispute regarding the computer output (copy or print-out). It may be more feasible for many litigants to bring the original device, such as a computer, laptop, or mobile phone, to court than to get the HASH value fixed through an expert.
What is HASH value (in simplest terms)?
Part III
Changes made in Sec. 27 (Recovery/Discovery)
Section 25, 26 and 27, Indian Evidence Act | Section 23, Bhartiya Sakshya Act |
25. Confession to police officer not to be proved. –– No confession made to a police-officer, shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. 26. Confession by accused while in custody of police not to be proved against him. –– No confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a policeofficer, unless it be made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shall be proved as against such person. Explanation.––In this section “Magistrate” does not include the head of a village discharging magisterial functions in the Presidency of Fort St. George or elsewhere, unless such headman is a Magistrate exercising the powers of a Magistrate under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 18827 (10 of 1882). 27. How much of information received from accused may be proved. –– Provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered inconsequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police-officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. | 23. Confession to police officer. (1) No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. |
(2) No confession made by any person while he is in the custody of a police officer, unless it is made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate shall be proved against him:
The proposed Bhartiya Sakshya Act, 2023 introduces two significant changes in Sec. 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Changes in the New Act (Made to Sec. 27, IEA)
A Discordant Note
Sec. 27 Indian Evidence Act (Proviso to Sec. 23 Bhartiya Sakshya Act) Analysed
Who has to “depose” – It is by the police officer, and before the court.
What is to be Deposed – It is the fact he discovered as disclosed by the accused.
“As Discovered” (in consequence of information from accused)
‘Fact discovered‘ embraces Place of Concealment and Knowledge of Accused
The classic Privy Council verdict, Pulukuri Kotayya v. King Emperor, AIR 1947 PC 67, consistently followed by the courts in India, made it clear, as regards the concealment of a knife, as under-
‘Fact Discovered’ is the “Place to the Knowledge of the Accused”
From Pulukuri Kotayya v. King Emperor it is clear –
Read in this cluster (Click on the topic):
Civil Suits: Procedure & Principles
Book No, 1 – Civil Procedure Code
Power of attorney
Title, ownership and Possessio n
Adverse Possession
Principles and Procedure
Admission, Relevancy and Proof
Land Laws / Transfer of Property Act
Evidence Act – General
Sec. 65B
Law on Documents
Interpretation
Contract Act
Law on Damages
Easement
Stamp Act & Registration
W ill
Arbitration
Divorce/Marriage
Negotiable Instruments Act
Book No. 2: A Handbook on Constitutional Issues
Book No. 3: Common Law of CLUBS and SOCIETIES in India
Book No. 4: Common Law of TRUSTS in India